PPEP!
Due to a minor mishap/misunderstanding/deliberate sabotage(?) the house will be without internet for a week. This is perhaps good or bad. It means I have to get out of the house, and it means I can get on with studying more.
It’s really weird, but I’m sort of enjoying studying. I know, right? It’s just there’s really nothing else to do, and it’s nice to sit down in the Brotherton with a copy of 涼宮ハルヒの憂鬱 (The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya) and slowly decipher the contents into OneNote (which is my new favourite program, being that I can take my laptop down to uni, make notes or write something, then sync it with my desktop seamlessly when I get home). Certainly, light novels such as Haruhi are a lot easier than real literature like Mishima’s 潮騒 (The Sound of Waves), which I imagine is difficult reading even for fluent Japanese, what with obscure kanji and unconventional readings.
Speaking of difficult reading, Baudrillard! I mean, I consider myself pretty intelligent, and I did philosophy at A-Level, but this guy … Maybe it’s a bad translation. I certainly hope it’s a bad translation, because it reads like a dodgy Babelfish job from French to English via Hungarian. To give you an idea of what it’s like, I will temporarily write in the style of Baudrillard’s prose: certainly the style of one who’s vaudevillian rhapsody runs counter to the mainstream philosophy, which is to say a certain je ne sais quoi of proto-normal Russian doctrine, vis-à-vis the normal interacting with the hyperunsymbotic. Kennedy knew this: thus, the ultimate symbol of American satiety is the death of consumerist ballet as seen in the unbalance of Trotsky minus the special luminosity of what one might call the wrangling of modern fixation on the zabological mannichopology of the general public’s resistance to santological deflectance (PPEP!) and ultimately, what Walt Disney was getting at was this: that there can be no society without the emblence of grisstitude.
No, that barely manages to capture the sheer confusion of reading Simulacra and Simulation. Perhaps I need to read more. He still has some good points, in the same way that a broken clock is right twice a day and how a blind squirrel sometimes finds an acorn and other sayings. But as Baudrillard writes on page 15,
Now, one must conceive of TV along the lines of DNA as an effect in which the opposing poles of determination vanish, according to a nuclear contraction, retraction, of the old polar schema that always maintained a minimal distance between cause and effect, between subject and object: precisely the distance of meaning, the gap, the difference, the smallest possible gap (PPEP!), irreducible under pain of reabsorption into an aleatory and indeterminate process whose discourse can no longer account for it, because it is itself a determined order.
PPEP! PPEP! PPEP! The rallying cry of the postmodernists! PPEP!












Recent Comments